Thursday, August 23, 2012
Who's to blame
NBC Nightly News last night reported on a poll done by the Pew
Research Center which asked people in the middle class (I am not sure how this
was defined or determined) who they blamed for the financial problems of the
middle class. Not surprisingly, the
answers were everyone but themselves.
Congress got most of the blame. Sixty-two percent of respondents blamed
Congress “a lot.” Banks got a hefty dose
of blame, 54 percent, as did large corporations, 47 percent. Former President Bush’s administration bore
the blame of 44 percent, compared to Obama’s 34 percent. “Foreign competition” was held a lot
responsible by 39 percent. And way down
on the bottom of the list, almost invisible, was the middle class itself with
only eight percent. That’s right, when
people look to blame someone for their problems they look everywhere but in the
mirror.
It is always easy to blame politicians and the government for
problems, although I am not sure if people can be very specific about how,
exactly, Congress has caused the financial mess. Too many taxes? Too few programs? Insufficient regulation of the financial
services industry or too much government intervention into business? I bet those polled would not be consistent
about why they blame the government.
Similarly, have banks
and big companies outsourced too many jobs?
Perhaps they charge too high prices.
Or maybe they don’t pay enough taxes. Did they give out too many mortgages, or
foreclose too often? Did the bailout salvage
companies which should have been allowed to go under?
Far too often the media, and by extension most people, search
for someone to blame when bad things happen.
When Hurricane Katrina caused massive destruction and loss of life, it
was not the result of a random and unpredictable meteorological event, but the
fault of the Army Corps of Engineers. And,
like the media, the fault never lies in ourselves, it is always in our stars. I don’t know if this is human nature, or the
product of a Dr. Spock society which believes the answer to gangs is enhanced self-esteems. Whatever the reason, as far as I am concerned,
unless the middle class, and everyone else, decides to alter their behavior as
a result of taking some responsibility, I doubt these problems can be solved.
It was not the government which forced people to try to
exploit the rise in housing prices by buying massive homes, filling them with
overpriced furniture and expensive toys, and then continually refinancing their
mortgages to gain more favorable interest rates in order to increase their
disposable income. Big banks did not
discourage Americans from setting aside even the most minimal amount necessary
for retirement. Big corporations did not
seduce Americans into spending far more than they earn, putting charge after
charge on their credit cards. While the
credit card companies did exacerbate the problem by increasing credit lines and
encouraging account switching with low initial rates, almost nobody had a gun
to their head when buying a new Playstation or adding channels to their
DirecTV.
There is plenty enough blame all around, but for these poll
respondents to ascribe so little to themselves and so much to others reflects a
worldview that plays into the politics of hate, fear, and divisiveness. That is why we have commercials where former
Obama voters are now disillusioned. They
thought one man, albeit the most powerful man in the world, would save the
day. The idea that the cause of these
economic problems runs deep, and that solutions will require not only
government action but individual sacrifice, seems alien to the national
debate.
I doubt my parents’ generation would have laid the blame to
such a great extent on others. They had
lived through the Depression and certainly realized macroeconomic factors
generated that catastrophe, but emerging from the Depression, they accepted
that the greatest protection for individuals and families came from the
individuals and families. Excessive
credit, living beyond their means, even credit cards themselves, were seen as
problematic if not unwise. They did buy
houses with mortgages, but they often lived in those houses for decades,
driving old cars, wearing old clothes, and indulging their spoiled
children. These children grew up in the
80s “Me decade” practicing that excess is never enough. So much of their money went to expensive
clothes, fancy vacations, fast cars, online gambling, and drugs.
So now that the children of these children are facing an
uncertain future, but one which appears more bleak than their parents’ past,
someone has to take the blame. Bush,
Obama, JP Morgan Chase, Chinese workers, Obstructionist Republicans, and
Liberal Democrats, can all suffice as scapegoat. After all, whatever happens, it is never our
fault.
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]